The Rapture, 2026

Ah, yes.

The Rapture.

Since the U.S. Armed Forces has brought up the subject, I thought I’d finally go ahead and share what this crazy old man believes about it.

It’s over. It happened a long time ago. People who followed Jesus of Nazareth were caught up (the literal meaning of “rapture”) to Him, translated from corruptible flesh into incorruptible. Just like the apostle Paul describes. Not all of them; some of them “slept,” or died — but they got to go first.

Why do I say this? Because Paul describes it as imminent, immediate, soon — over and over. “Don’t quit your jobs thinking it’s too imminent,” he advises. But his description is urgent.

When did it happen? I don’t know. Maybe at the destruction of the temple and the siege of Jerusalem by Rome. Maybe later. Possibly at a time that was so chaotic that no one saw them go, however it happened. People running; people perhaps trying to leave Jerusalem as they had been warned. It fits with the Matthew 25 picture, and other hints like it.

I think that moment is a good candidate, because it was the moment that the Almighty forever changed the way He does business with mortal men. No more sacrifice for evil. That price has been paid. No further blood can enrich it.

Only life itself … lived in grace toward self, toward others, for Him. Only that is acceptable; the image of His own grace daily shown.

So did we miss it? The Rapture? Having not been born at that time?

Well, if we did, then a lot of believers did — including some who endured horrific torture and murder as martyrs. And others, like John of Patmos who recorded the Revelation, lived long lives.

Or we could think in terms of God’s unlimited capabilities, especially regarding life, death, creation, destruction, resurrection, and perhaps even the flow of time in direction and speed itself.

Is anything impossible for God, including whisking the essence of each one of us back to the moment when that gathering took place in our past — but doing so at the moment each of us breathes our last?

So that we could see and experience what those believers did at the moment they changed and went to be with the One they loved, and loved with their whole hearts and lives?

That’s what I think happens, anyway; and it’s a moment immutable in history because it already happened, it was always going to happen and it’s going to keep happening as long as there are mortals who die.

That way, nobody misses out.

The ones who had already passed on when it came — well, it would only seem like an instant for them since they had died, as it would for those to whom it happened after they died much later on.

I think all the apocalyptic language that is attached to the prophecy of it happening is the attempt to hint at the indescribable; to share a glimpse of the unseeable; to capture a moment of timelessness.

What happens after that, I don’t know. Some kind of judgment or decision about whether the lives we’ve lived and the potential that we showed in that life can find fulfillment in eternity. Or maybe just needs to end, to close out in the same grace that must be shown to those who can never have or control enough … or who cannot live forever as equals with others they judged and hated and cheated and killed. That would be torture for them. Maybe in the blinding light of truth, we judge ourselves.

“Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven,” as the poem says.

Or perhaps the blinding light of truth brings its own grace, and instead of an eternity of nothingness, instead an awareness of what was not — maybe could not — be learned in the mortal realm: joy, love, patience, acceptance, respect and peace in the soul. A late epiphany. A flash of penitence. A grasp of the unimaginable. A commitment to all that is good thereafter.

I like to hope it will not be too late. I like to hope that the Creator’s great cosmic experiment in the efficacy of faith in the absence of tangible evidence to inspire the positive attributes of existence won’t necessarily mean it’s denied to those who are at a disadvantage in the mortal universe. — Those who were surrounded only by the negative and could never know more.

A lot of damage, I believe, has been done in preaching a permanent, eternal binary of good and evil that must, no matter what, be accepted on faith right now, no matter what mortal life has been like to the one who must choose between them.

Of course I think it’s best to choose a life of grace now, and make the mortal part of our existence better and more positive for others as well as ourselves. Of course.

Still … I like to hope that grace can reach beyond here and now. Especially since it has cost so much.

But I don’t know. It’s not my creation, not my experiment, not my call. I’m not omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent or in any other way qualified to judge.

I just hope.

And that has to be enough.

Gone

I think we all need now to operate under the assumption that we no longer have any civil rights.

Those are gone.

No First Amendment. No Second Amendment. No rights at all. The government will enforce this cancellation with deadly force.

And I, for one, will not let that stop me from repeating the facts about it, and exercising my rights as a citizen even if they no longer exist.

The events of the past week reinforce the truth that — at home or abroad — our government is no longer the good guy.

Our president cannot wait to incite another revolution, foreign or domestic, and he does not really care which or how violent or who dies — as long as he is the hero who can declare peace by deadly force.

Gut check

If you say you are a Christian — a follower of Christ — and yet you have no compassion for the stranger, the visitor, the immigrant … how can you possibly read of His life and words and not be moved by His grace toward those even His people would have called “the least of these?”

Have you forgotten?

Have you never read them?

Have you only listened to the words of a man in a pulpit that you pay to not offend you so that you won’t fire him?

Does he tell you only what you want to hear? What is easy to hear?

Does he even talk about Jesus of Nazareth at all?

Or does he only talk about why you should fear others not like you? About your country and your flag and your borders and your rights and your safety?

Does he speak gloriously of war and conquering and winning but say nothing of those who have lost it all, are homeless and poor and hungry, or that they alone are to blame?

Does he speak about life choices you make anywhere but the voting booth? Of acceptance, grace, compassion, generosity, charity, forgiveness, love? Toward others? As Christ has shown to you? Blessing as you have been blessed?

Can you even be sure you are attending a church, if that is the case?

Or is it just a weekly political rally with a little churchiness thrown in to make self appear sacred and America feel angelic and warfare seem worthy and greed glitter like golden goodness?

Go back to the source, I beg you.

Read for yourself who your Savior truly is and what He saves you from as well as what He saves you for; what He wants to do through you as well as for you.

Because He is trying to save you from yourself, for the benefit to you and your character in this life as well as the next, and for the blessing of others.

Others like you.

Others not quite like you.

Others, wholly and completely different from you.

The mission field He brought to your neighborhood.

The souls He created in His own image.

The ones He lived and died for, and would live for again, through you.

Don’t let them down.

Don’t let Him down.

And don’t pretend you’re following Him if He leads you to them … and you turn your back on them and walk away.

Wordless

I don’t know what to say anymore about the United States government’s headlong rush into fascist racist imperialism … tempting war, internal tumult, isolation from allies, plus likely economic and societal collapse.

We are led by lawless, compassionless, brainless, murderous bigots and perverts who daily gnaw away at the Constitution and democracy in the vain attempt to satisfy their limitless lust for wealth and power over others.

And I’m choosing some of the nicer words at my disposal.

That’s all I can write for now, or I will be right on the edge of breaking down for the third or fourth time today.

Thirty-five

Today would have been the thirty-fifth wedding anniversary for Angi and me.

There has only ever been one woman who loved me so much that she wanted to spend the rest of her life with me.

And she did.

And she’s gone, these twelve-and-a-half years now.

Someone who still makes my life richer through treasured memories, two wonderful children and now three grandchildren, whom I love and embrace on her behalf as surely as for myself.

Over these dozen years without her, I’ve come to realize that the chances of lightning striking the same place in my heart now, with someone else, are vanishingly small … and that’s all right.

And that’s really all I’m able to say about that on December 27, 2025.

Not-quite-right Christmas

Does Christmas not feel quite right to you?

Then you have something in common — in varying degrees — with self-absorbed Ebenezer Scrooge, bankrupted George Bailey, worried Charlie Brown, skeptical little Susan Walker, the jealous Grinch, questioning Cindy Lou Who, the doubtful nameless hero boy of “Polar Express,” disillusioned Betty Haynes, divorced Scott Calvin and any number of other major characters in classic holiday films.

And that commonality leads me to believe that “not quite right Christmas” is an experience shared by more people than might be willing to admit it.

After all, Christmas is supposed to be the season of hope; the hope of the world, right?

Yet the world just goes on being the world, and people go right on being people.

Things change; not always for the better.

Losses happen.

Jesus comes, but then He goes again.

The light of hope can become clouded and even obscured by the darkness of disappointment and even despair.

I think I get that. I’ve been there plenty of times in my life, and not always at Christmas.

But I’m learning to look for the light; in others, in giving, in kindness, in faith. I’m figuring out how to turn outward from inside myself, where it can get pretty dark. To reflect the light. Even to be the fuel that the light burns.

I’m trying to see opportunity in life; even if it’s the shadowy opportunity to learn empathy from sharing in the suffering of others, and seeing their strength, and attempting to lend some of my own.

If there’s anything in common with all the holidays of the season, I think it’s that we need light; there must be light in these days of longer darkness for us northern hemisphere dwellers:

  • Gratitude, for plentiful harvest and having enough.
  • Generosity in sharing the excess.
  • Grace toward others, because we all begin again — not just as each year ends — but as each outgrown season of life comes to a close.

Those things are what I see helping make the world a little more right when it doesn’t feel quite right.

At Christmas, or any other time.

Misidentified

It costs you absolutely nothing to respect another person’s identity and use the pronouns for them that they prefer.

Not one red cent.

You accommodate a woman who marries and tells you whether she wants to be addressed as “Ms.” or “Mrs.” or by her husband’s last name or her original last name or just her first name. It may be a little complex, but you do it.

You use the title “Dr.” when a person earns that degree.

You want people to use the correct way of addressing you, don’t you?

I bring it up because, once again today, I was misidentified. I’m an old straight dude with a beard and long hair who has always identified as male. But the Walmart supervisor behind me at the self checkout asked me, “Do you need any help, ma’am?”

And when I turned, smiling, and she saw my beard, she blushed and apologized. “Oh, it’s you!” she said. (We’ve chatted amiably many times.) “I’m so sleep-deprived I don’t even know who I am today!” she added.

“It’s the hair; it throws people off,” I grinned. “Not a problem.”

(By the way, her lovely white hair is worn in a crew cut.)

It didn’t cost her anything to want to address me correctly; not a penny. And her kind, self-effacing apology quickly communicated that she respected that.

We don’t lose anything by respecting others. In fact, we stand to gain something by getting to know people and respecting them, even if we’re unfamiliar with how they see themselves.

We stand to gain a friendship.

We learn by listening, and we stand to gain a deeper understanding of and respect toward others — as, I would venture to say, we would appreciate others respecting and getting to understand us better.

And it literally costs us nothing.

Confession time

I have not been to church for several years.

I went to church almost every time the doors were open from infancy on up. Until a few years ago.

I kinda stopped going during the pandemic and never really went back. Oh, I kept preaching online for my little home church here in Eureka Springs. And for a while after we decided to meet again.

Then I retired and stopped going.

I had no problems with anyone there. Sweet people, and I miss them.

But at some point, my longstanding questions about why we “do” church the way we “do” church had no satisfying answers.

I had been asking myself for years why we were there; why weren’t we out doing things together to help other people?

Feeding the hungry? Visiting the ill and injured? Housing the homeless? Helping the unemployed get jobs? Getting things fixed and painted for older people? Giving lost folks directions to the places they want to go? All kinds of things that just HELP?

Instead we sit for a lecture about what we should already have read and know. We sing and pray things that praise God who wants actions more than words, and supposedly encourage each other instead of asking what’s wrong or how-can-we-help or listening. We give to pay a staff to do some of these things for us instead of experiencing the joy of caring, and a building to do them in (and the utilities/maintenance for it). We have elders, deacons and boards to look after all that, often instead of each other, and then to deal with excluding people who weren’t included enough not to do something wrong that would embarrass the church. Does helping people go out really help them out?

Not once in scripture do I find a menu or even an example of the acts of worship we’ve all generally agreed upon in connection with a gathered church. Sometimes a visiting missionary would share a long mission report and some poor weary chap would fall asleep and out of a window, but I’m not sure that was supposed to be exemplary.

There were no examples of purchased buildings, on-site staff, performing choirs or bands or special effects or testimonies or much of anything else that was for us but not for Him.

I find in the teachings and life of Jesus of Nazareth many examples of people being fed, cared for, healed and taught by parable and thought-questions whether there was a crowd around or not.

Thing is, I think over the centuries, people came up with a formula for doing church themselves that often conveniently required the minimum development of character and involvement in the lives of others with the maximum expenditure of donated funds.

And while some may have greatly simplified and reduced the expenditure of that formula, it’s often the same old things being done in the same old ways. I’m not sure that’s for everyone. I’m not sure that it really helps anyone in their spiritual development to be more loving and caring outside that circle of fellowship — perhaps to the folks who feel the need for grace and inclusion the most.

In the end, it was not encouraging me. And I didn’t feel like I could go on trying to encourage people within it.

So I’ve outed myself as a believer in God now, but not particularly a believer in church as we “do” it. (That will save everyone else the trouble of outing me. 🙂)

I’m not exactly a cloistered monk though. Church is still all around me, because church is the kingdom of God in this world. I’m surrounded by His kids, whether they’ve known or accepted His paternity or not. I’m serving in my own way with my meager set of skills and resources; loving others no matter what, calling out dumb stuff that should be obvious, giving directions to sidewalkers who are befuddled by Eureka Springs maps, holding doors open, donating food cans when I can, smiling, giving out free compliments, always being available for hugs and a cup of coffee. There are civic groups willing to accept my help with bigger needs, so I try to support them. My cottage is a place of welcome.

I’m the church, 24/7, just like everyone else who wants to love and care and help when they can, whether individually or in a group. It’s just that our costs of doing business are lower.

And, perhaps, the reward of the joy of being part of it firsthand seems greater.

A Sound of Thunder

Butterfly Effect

In 1952, science fiction writer Ray Bradbury published a short story titled “A Sound of Thunder,” almost certainly inspiring the thought-problem term “butterfly effect” coined by meteorologist Edward Norton Lorenz in the 1960s.

“Butterfly Effect” describes the phenomenon of a tiny event (the death of a butterfly under time-traveler Eckels’ boot, in Bradbury’s story) inexplicably causing a huge consequence later on.

In 9th grade I managed a paperback book shelf inside Perry East Junior High before school and spent most of my earnings there. I bought “R is for Rocket,” an anthology containing the short story by Bradbury and devoured every word.

This story stuck with me perhaps more than the others, and only partly because of the unintended consequence at the end involving the election of a strong man named Deutscher as president, “not that fool weakling Keith.”

At the beginning of the story, the “man behind the desk” at the time travel agency had been excited about the election of Keith.

For one thing, I resolved then and there not to run for public office.

But also my 9th-grade mind was sharp enough to realize that small actions can also, sometimes, yield big results.

Given time.

So I also resolved to engage in those small acts of kindness in the hope for better outcomes.

Yesterday, a little better than half our country’s voters elected what they perceive as a “strong man.” (He isn’t, but that’s irrelevant.)

Each vote cast contributed to that outcome, and it was overnight — even though the small events that led to his popularity took decades — against all odds, common sense, moral dignity and good taste — to have their cumulative effect.

What I want to advocate now is serious rebellion against that trend — in tiny, quiet, small ways. Acts of kindness. Words of support. Unashamed expressions of brotherly love. Showing grace. Being generous. Fostering unity.

It may take time — perhaps not millions of years, like Eckels’ journey — but that only means the best time to start is right now.

I might even end up running for public office as a result.

You might one day elect that fool weakling Keith.

(Below: 1. an excerpt from near the close of “A Sound of Thunder.” 2. The story’s earlier description of Deutscher.)

Here for you

I am here for you.

Right here in my house.

Not out with you saying awkward things while you’re trying to meet new friends.

I am here for you.

The friend that you don’t really need but I’m glad you have.