I seem to have two choices. Okay, there are a lot more choices for President, but among them only two men have a real chance to serve in that office.

I can vote for Barack Obama and pray fiercely that he will not enact laws that will make convenient abortion* more convenient while Christians are struggling to explain to a post-modern world why they believe it to be morally wrong.

I can vote for John McCain and pray fervently that he will not incite or perpetuate military action that will cause more wholesale death and destruction among lost people in other nations: men, women, children, babies.

Voting for either one, I will still need to pray with all my heart that a second Depression for our nation (and therefore, the world) will not be required to illuminate where true riches need to be sought, and that followers of Christ will still be up to the task of selling their possessions and seeing to it that no one is in need.

Okay, there are lots more issues at stake than these, and if you have read my blog for any length of time, you will know what else I will be praying for. And you can really boil most of it down, weed out the selfishness, and it would be: “Thy kingdom come; thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”

So I will continue praying, right up to the moment that I pencil that dark splotch next to the name of a Presidential candidate and his running mate on November 4.

If you have any interest at all, right now I am not inclined to vote for John McCain. As President, he would be Commander-in-Chief of military forces which can be sent anywhere in the world at any hour of the day or night to do anything he orders, and Senator McCain has expressed an interest in – I am sorry to have to put it this way – attacking first and negotiating later. And while he might have an opportunity to appoint new members of the Supreme Court, this body has not heard a case in 35 years that has moved it to overturn Roe v. Wade, and its current cast of characters is relatively youthful.

I am inclined to vote for Barack Obama. As President, there is not a great deal that he could do on his own to worsen the existing deluge of women choosing to have abortions – not without the help of Congress, which should have its hands full investigating the nation’s economic meltdown and taking measures to keep it from getting worse. On this matter, Senator Obama’s plans seem to favor a greater number of disadvantaged Americans without relying only on the generosity of the insanely wealthy to voluntarily redistribute income by employing them, which corporate America seems loath to do.

Given the remarks of former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan before the House of Representatives today, it is only astounding to some people that the reason a free market economy must have some legal, restraining factors is common, ordinary, anyone-can-have-it-rich-or-poor greed.

I know this pragmatic choice will offend many people, including many dear brothers and sisters in Christ – some of whom believe with all their hearts that there is one and only one issue upon which their vote must be based.

But, with all due respect to them, voting is only one choice and it is an easy one and it ultimately doesn’t really solve the question of rampant, convenient abortion. Solutions usually come as the result of really hard choices.

One really hard choice we are called to make is to reach out, gracefully explaining Christ’s selfless nature to women who would choose convenient abortion whether it is legal or not.

Another really hard choice we are called to make is supporting women who choose to keep their babies or to offer them for adoption – supporting them emotionally, spiritually and financially.

Still another really hard choice we are called to make is the one made by eleven couples at my home church, electing to serve as foster and adoptive parents for babies – many of them of a different race – which are born to mothers who might have otherwise chosen abortion.

Now those are hard choices – as well as pragmatic ones – and they make a difference.

---

_{*I use the term “convenient abortion” to differentiate it from medically-necessary abortion – and even abortion resulting from rape, though there are those who have valiantly avoided the latter. Scripture does not anywhere suggest that any kind of abortion is the unforgiveable sin (after all, there are spontaneous abortions that no one chooses), and I have to suspect that God has good reasons for that. Abortion that is sought to avoid difficult consequences of foolish actions is what I define as “convenient” – and completely selfish.}

I must confess that I really like stories of the Yule season that are tainted with the bittersweet flavor of the macabre, much more than the sugar-saturated milk chocolate Santas of mainstream entertainment.

I can understand the self-absorbed, self-made miser who needs to be haunted by a departed partner and led to the cemetery that is the natural conclusion to his ungenerous life.

I can identify with the building and loan patron saint who has been robbed and defrauded, despondent and in need of rescue by a third-class angel sponsored by eerie-sounding disembodied friends.

I even like brief moments such as the glimpse of a huge Christmas tree in the background with a young wizard apprentice poignantly sitting mostly alone in the Great Hall of Hogwarts while his classmates go home for the holidays … the well-timed appearance of the holiday saint in the world of the wardrobe to give gifts that are weapons of war to children who will need them … the fall from the rooftop of the current jolly old elf and his subsequent demise, requiring the recruitment of a new one.

I’m especially fond of tales like the latter, old or new, of unlikely souls filling the shoes of a missing Santa.

So it was a foregone conclusion that I would enjoy Terry Pratchett’s Hogfather (rentable at most Blockbuster locations), the 2006 made-for-British-television 189-minute two-parter. The story takes place on Discworld, which is a great flat stone of a planet, gliding through space on the backs of four elephants who are, in turn, on the back of the great sea turtle A’Tuin. That’s not particularly germane to the story, but serves to let you know that you are definitely elsewhere.

On Discworld, the pooled belief of its denizens can actually cause a real person to exist, personifying such concepts as Death, or the Bogeyman, or the Tooth Fairy. Dark forces have gone to the twin cities of Ankh-Morpork and have hired a professional assassin from the local guild to eliminate the local version of Father Christmas, who is known as the Hogfather. The assassin, Mr. Teatime (pronounced Tay-Ah-Tah-May), has an ingenious plan. His foil is Death – the classic Grim Reaper – who, while making his rounds on Hogswatch Eve, has become aware that the Hogfather is missing in action, due to the disbelief of children everywhere.

Death puts on the Hogfather’s empty red-and-white fur cloak and resumes making deliveries from the boar-driven sleigh -including a humorous public appearance or two. At the same time, he recruits his granddaughter-by-adoption Susan, to become a reluctant warrior in the pursuit of Teatime – operating in the one place where Death cannot go. Susan is a governess to two children who have reached the end of their faith in the Hogfather, but are perplexed that their imaginary fears have become quite real monsters in closets, which Susan has become skilled at dispatching with a hearth poker.

It requires the help of a thinking machine created by the bumbling wizards of the Unseen University to compute that the lack of faith in the existence of the Hogfather has been responsible for the surplus of belief creating unexpected monsters under the bed and bathroom elves and sock-eaters and oh-gods of hangovers. Ultimately, while Death is filling in for the Hogfather, it is up to Susan to stop Teatime and his employers, and rescue the swine-saint from nonexistence.

Absurd? Of course. But what incredible production values for a made-for-television miniseries!

And an incisive insight or two from a very humanist writer. (Though I completely disagree with his choice of words. What he calls the great lies – justice, for example – are in fact the great, though intangible, truths without which society cannot exist.)

In fact, I would say that most of the recruited Santa stories I like so much are based on the very humanist presumption that it is culturally necessary for a loving and generous Santa to exist; therefore, we have created him. And that within us is the innate ability to become that Santa when called to the task.

Which is, of course, completely backward from the truth: that there is a loving and generous God who exists; therefore, it was necessary for Him to create us … then to rescue us from our selfishness, not with an old saint who brings tangible gifts, but with an Infant Son in a manger who will bring eternal gifts to all who will take them and become them.

That’s the short version, to be sure.

Yet it’s not a stretch to say that the original Christmas story has that dark bittersweet flavor of truth. Some time after the Infant was born, an evil king learned of it through Magi and saw a threat to his throne, ordering the slaughter of all baby boys in Bethlehem. The path from the manger would lead to a cross – but it would not stop there.

The battle was engaged: the battle between self and selfless, between greed and generosity, between despondence and hope.

It continues, every moment, every year, every season – Halloween or All Saint’s Day; Dia de los Muertos or Christmas. And if there are not warriors, reluctant or willing, who will take up the spiritual hearth poker … then the great irony of Hogfather is that our planet will also become a world where assassination is a highly-respected, guilded profession.

Tonight is the last of the Obama/McCain presidential debates.

I wish I had thought of it sooner, but it occurred to me that I could probably have made a fortune earlier in the campaign by having these yard signs made up and selling them on eBay:

After all, why shouldn’t I have made some buckage off of unrepentant racists and mysoginists?

Our economy is faltering because it is based on two things that should balance each other: faith and greed.

They are out of balance because greed got the upper hand; because financial institutions preferred to go bankrupt rather than refinance loans that they should not have made in the first place. They had faith that they could satisfy their greed by making loans to people who could not repay them, and those people had faith in the economy to grow so that they could earn more and pay more on ballooning loans so they could satisfy their greed for a home they could not afford, and employers had faith that they could satisfy their greed by being more loyal to stockholders than they have been to their employees or even to their customers.

Now that faith has been betrayed – by nearly all of us – and the ripples have begun to spread outward from those assets dropping into the tank, and chaos is beginning to result from the interaction of the ripples.

Last week, the stock market plummeted.

Today, the stock market skyrocketed – probably as much because people saw the opportunity to satiate greed at good prices as it was the result of any decision or policy or rescue.

Neither movement fixed anything that was broken. And more chaotic undulations are likely before balance is regained.

There are many solid, Christian writers who have adequately pointed out where (that is, in Whom) we should have had our faith, and I won’t bother to echo their wisdom.

What’s important now is to decide where we go from here.

What’s important to realize is that nothing has essentially changed with regard to the basic, real assets that this nation and the world have at their disposal: energy, innovation, natural resources, manufacturing capability, skilled labor – and all of the other good things with which God blessed this unique planet.

I don’t agree with all of the observations and policies of John McCain (nor his opponent Barack Obama), but if this is what he meant when he said that the fundamentals of the economy are sound, I could not agree more.

But if those fundamentals are to include greed and self-interest completely unbalanced by faith in God’s providence and in each other, then things get out of whack and assets get dropped and economies tank and ripples collide.

Sometimes the spans between posts go long.

I am glad that there are folks who want to read what I want to write, and are patient even though disappointed when they come upon a post that has grown several days stale.

But sometimes I can’t write what I want to write.

You see, I’ve made a commitment to say A Prayer Before Blogging, and some of the things that I want to write before saying that prayer cannot be written after.

It isn’t always a lack of ideas, or writer’s block, or a deficit of inspiration that stops the posts from igniting the pixels on your monitor. From time to time, it’s compliance in the face of inspiration from the very Spirit I have asked to receive that prevents a post from being written.

To write it anyway would be defiant and selfish -much like Saul, unwilling to wait longer for Samuel, burning the pre-battle sacrifice himself to please God even though he knew it was against what God had commanded.

There was a time, I remember, when the instruction to John of Patmos was to seal, and another time it was to reveal.

I need the discernment to know what time it is.

Bear with me.

Pray for me.

And I will bend the knee as well.

I absolutely detest it.

When candidates and their parties lift sequences of their opponents’ public speeches and comments completely out of context in order to attach some new, radical and disfavorable meaning to them, it is disingenuous, dishonorable, and dishonest.

It is a lie. The truth is not in it.

And it just further contributes to the culture of permissible lying-by-surgical-excision, even in what is called Christianity -but cannot be true Christlikeness.

If you lie about what others have said in order to bolster your point of view and discredit a candidate or policy, it is as surely distasteful to God as if you had done it to His Word. If you pass on a lie that is original with someone else, you are lying – whether in person, by e-mail, YouTube or international television. Politics does not excuse fraudulence. Not even “being right” can mitigate “being caught in a sin” when you lie.

Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. ~ Galatians 6:7-8

What’s the difference between the Pharisees accusing Jesus of violating God’s law by doing something not specifically authorized in scripture (Matthew 12, Mark 3:1-6, Luke 6:1-11) and when Christians today accuse other Christians of violating God’s law by doing something not specifically authorized in scripture?

What makes it right for Christians in century twenty-one, but wrong for Pharisees in century one?